Saturday, November 23, 2019

Frozen 2 Review



Well here we are, it's 2019 and we're wizzed back to the icy juggernaut with a sequel to 2013's smash hit, "Frozen 2." And of course, it's breathtaking! The visuals constantly dazzled, enhanced by the 3D glasses I paid a slight surcharge for, and the songs! My goodness! Are any stuck in my head currently? Well, no, but give it time, I'm sure tomorrow when I'm at the store every child will be singing one or two of the newest ballets while I wait at checkout.

It's also darker, a more intimate affair with the beloved characters, exploited to their rawest emotions, some of the deeper animated expressions from the House of Mouse in a long time. Remember how the death of Elsa and Anna's parents in "Frozen 1" was glossed over in the beginning? Well here not only are they alive via flashbacks, but we also explore the site of their demise, as well as a few plot developments and the impacts to the dual female leads (of course leading to more than a few CGI tears shed). Ballads this time around emphasise less on grand scale and more on more the characters, choosing closeup shots over the lavish autumn environments. It's moments like this, and there are a lot of them, that bring these more mature themes to the level kids will hopefully not just pay attention to, but also understand.

Take the signature song of secondary character Olaf (Josh Gad), the dimwitted snowman, "When I Am Older." Dealing with the realizations of not understanding the world around him, it's packed with a host of visual gags, but the concept is not your typical bright and cheery noise (and thank god there are Dreamworks-esque pop song phoned in).

We follow Elsa (Idina Menzel), now more comfortably resting as Queen of Arendelle, though recently bothered by a haunting voice that hums just a few notes. She doesn't share this with her sister Anna (Kristen Bell) or Anna's boyfriend Kristoff (Jonathan Groff) (or that damn dopey snowman), but she unintentionally awakens the four elemental spirits (earth, water, fire and air) and their forced to evacuate their kingdom. This leads our foursome (well, fivesome if you include Sven the reindeer) to the Enchanted Forest, guarded by a wall of fog that prevents anyone from entering or returning.

The voice unlocks then traps our group inside, only to find lost Arendelle soldiers battling the Northuldra tribe, having done so for decades since the mist first formed. There are some vague Pocahontas vibes here, as its explained the two societies once shared a gentle alliance and the territory, only to turn to bloodshed. But the only way to end their conflict, and to calm the angered spirits, is to discover and repair history, as Elsa explains, and the cast separate on their way to Ahtohallan, a river of memories past.

I'm going to stop there summarizing the tale; I don't want to spoil anything. This is a relatively complex narrative, lacking a true villain, characters destined to fall in love, or a world to save (the only thing in danger here is their kingdom of Arendelle, hardly something Clark Kent would enter a telephone booth for). And compared against some of the upcoming animated films previewed before my early morning showing (I'm looking at you, "Playmobil: the Movie"), Disney seems to be mostly treating kids with the understanding that they're actually pretty smart.

What returns from its predecessor, aside from the glimpses of whimsy and astonishing musical numbers, is the confused narrative, which seems to forget about everyone but Elsa from time to time with its myriad of twists and turns and plethora of underdeveloped tertiary characters. I mean, does anyone remember the Duke of Weselton from Frozen 1? Well, somehow he makes a brief cameo here (grumble grumble.) It's a disperate experience when you're not caught up in the amazing majesty.

Saturday, November 2, 2019

Terminator: Dark Fate Review



If there was ever a film franchise that never needed another sequel, it's "Terminator." The first two are sublime action sci-fi flicks (with the first one practically a slasher film), hell, even th 3D theme park attraction was damn fine. (Though there is some novelty in seeing Arnie return for the second sequel, "Rise of the Machines.")

But by this point, the plot, dealing with time travel, has become so convoluted, with so many timelines that this newest one, "Dark Fate," ignores everything after the second film! You know a franchise has no idea what it's doing when it needs to erase the developments established in an amusement park attraction! There is a major difference between a series like this and say, the James Bond pictures- "Terminator" is build purely around Arnold Schwarzenegger (and to a lesser extent, Linda Hamilton), not able to reinvigorate the stories with new blood. James Cameron even returns, albeit as a productor and receiving "story by" credit. So what we have here is 128 minutes "best hits" compilation, take it or leave it. I mostly took it.

Let's get the plot out of the way, because it's easily the weakest retread. Dani (Natalia Reyes) is this film's Sarah Connor (who's also here but...), a seemingly random girl who is suddenly attacked by the bad Terminator, the Rev-9 (Gabriel Luna) but then saved by Grace (Mackenzie Davis), the good Terminator (or enhanced person, whatever). The rest is a long chance scene, punctuated by the duo's rescue by Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton)'s rescue and the trio's rescue by T-800 (Arnie, AKA Carl, a name that builds to the film's biggest laugh). There are the usual body cloning, timeline explanations, and stunned bystanders- like I said, there is nothing new in the plot department. Even the subtle variations, which are disguised as twists, come off as stale.

The acting and action, also complete reruns of the first two movies, are a lot more successful, including some decent development considering the dialogue mostly returns from earlier entries, and of course, plenty of explosions, most of which are delightful. But we came here for Arnie and Linda, who slip so easily into their most iconic roles despite their varying screen time. They say what we expect them to say, and do the things we expect them to do, and the film expects that'll be enough. It's not, unfortunately, because we don't care about what's happening around them; how can I be excited with such a blatantly recycled plot!? There are three(!) people credited as screenwriters and five(!!) people getting "story by" credit- how was there not one original idea there?!

I suppose it's silly expecting something new here, but like when I brought up James Bond earlier, those films are essentially the same each time, only bigger, longer, and funnier, only to be reset for the next Bond. Why couldn't that happen here? I guess it's because people like Arnie, and Arnie likes being liked. It's not entirely wrong to say I'm disappointed here, but I'm definitely satisfied.