Twisters Review

It has been a long time since we've had a good disaster movie, and unfortunately the long-awaited stand-alone sequel to 1996's "Twister," annoyingly called "Twisters," is not one. It's as silly as one could want from a big-budget spectacle, but it's got problems so big you could fit a flying cow through it.

Of course, it's hard to go into this without thinking of the original, and it doesn't help that there is only so much plot you can shoe-horn into a movie about dangerous winds. Kate is our lead, played adequately by Daisy Edgar-Jones, who early on, with her boyfriend Jeb (Daryl McCormack) & team, we see trying out the idea of distributing sodium polyacrylate into tornadoes, which will soak up all the moisture; it's "the same thing used in pads" we're told. The film is clever enough to use a joke to explain movie-science, but doesn't bother with explaining what happens to the water-logged salt once it supposedly kills the twister. Does it drop to the ground? Get flung everywhere? Who cleans it up after? Questions, questions and more questions, and I should not be asking myself those in a disaster flick.

Anyway, the plan doesn't work and only her and pal Javi (Anthony Ramos) survive. We flash forward five years and the two haven't kept in touch, Kate working an office job and Javi forming the company "Storm Par," which uses military technology to scan tornadoes. He has all the latest technology and, gasp, investors. Problem is that they would need to get in real close to one, which is where Kate comes in. She agrees to work one week with him in Oklahoma, but uh-oh, wouldn't you know it, another team of storm-chasers is there, lead by Tyler (Glenn Powell). He wears a cowboy hat and speaks inconsistently with a southern accent, and runs a YouTube channel with his eclectic crew. They have names according to the credits but it doesn't matter. They are exclusively defined by their role; like Lily (Sasha Lane) who flies a drone, and Boone (Brandon Perea) who films his show (and yes, I had to look them up), so to me they were nothing more than "drone girl" and "camera guy," respectively. Such fleshed-out characterization.

This is a crippling problem, since for maybe the first hour we just get scene after scene of people driving towards big storms, and Tyler's team spend almost all their screen-time yelping and hollering as they do stupid tricks like setting off fireworks inside a twister. It's obnoxious and grating, so you feel like you paid to watch a free YouTube video at a theater.

Now you might be wondering, how do you set off fireworks in a tornado? Wouldn't that require driving into one? Several characters, several times, explicitly say not to be in a vehicle during one. Ah but you see, Tyler's truck is specially rigged to anchor into the ground, keeping him safe. Why other vehicles are sometimes safe and others sometimes not, however? I'm no meteorologist, or filmmaker, but it seems the film can't follow it's own logic.

So the dualing groups really don't have much to dual about, one is funded by rich people and the other subscribers, so since they're not competing for anything, there is absolutely zero tension. They cut each other off on roads leading to storms, because of the script tells them (and of course, there is only one road per twister). Eventually the narrative introduces morals to the story, with Kate prioritizing helping those post-twister and Javi wanting to collect his data instead, so soon she leaves for Glenn, because, I dunno, he's supposed to be charming. Yet the two have no chemistry, just two decent actors being paid to talk cute to each other. (It doesn't help that he looks way too old for her, much more so than their mild real-life age gap suggests.)

So what about the meat-and-potatoes of it all, the tornadoes themselves. I saw this on the biggest screen I could, but "Twisters" fails to showcase the wonder of tornadoes, the majesty of mother nature being a force of nature. Instead the action is chaotically filmed, the camera struggling to clearly show the actors and special effects, so it harshly bounces around. I suppose it was to create a sense of disorientation and unease, but what we got was just frustration. There's a lot of money on the screen, and it's a shame we never really get a good look at it.